Separate Commercial and Regulatory Functions
Fifa's latest governance issues have critics calling for a fundamental restructuring of the organization. According to Miguel Maduro, a former chair of Fifa’s governance committee, separating commercial operations from regulatory duties is essential. 'They have shown that they will bend the rules to make more money,' says Maduro. This conflict of interest is not in football's best interests.
Maduro suggests creating different corporate entities for each aspect of the organization. 'There would have to be a Chinese wall between these entities and they would have to have different incentives,' he explains. Current Fifa President Gianni Infantino’s aborted plan (FFE) aimed to introduce such separation but for inappropriate reasons, insiders note.
Introduce External Regulation
To ensure better accountability, external regulation could be introduced. The idea is similar to the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada), which holds sporting organizations accountable on governance-related issues. Uefa’s close relationship with Brussels and the European Leagues’ call for EU intervention over Infantino’s proposals underscore this pressing need.
'Change needs to be imposed from the outside,' says Maduro. External oversight could prevent internal conflicts and ensure compliance with ethical principles, such as fair competition.
Limit Presidency Power
The excessive power held by Fifa's president has fueled various controversies. Experts propose removing funding determination from the president’s role to avoid undue influence. Another proposal suggests rotating heads of Fifa’s six continental confederations as president to prevent one person from gaining too much control, similar to how it works in Swiss government.
Greater Transparency
Fifa's lack of transparency is a significant concern for campaigners. Not-for-profit Fair Square director Nick McGeehan emphasizes the need for audited accounts and greater engagement with media. ‘Fifa have a development budget that is equal to many big development agencies, but not only is there no needs analysis in terms of how that money is distributed but there is literally no evidence of any audits,’ he argues.
Rethink Development
Fifa’s current distribution methods are criticized for being unstrategic. ‘One country, one vote’ coupled with equal funding allocations may not address the real needs in different regions. Greater emphasis on grassroots development and technical training is needed to ensure long-term growth of football worldwide.
FAQ
? Will these reforms affect upcoming World Cups?
Experts agree that restructuring could enhance FIFA’s accountability and transparency, likely impacting future tournaments positively by improving governance.
? Can Fifa regain public trust through these changes?
Yes, increased external regulation and separation of functions can significantly rebuild public confidence. Transparency in financial dealings and strategic distribution of development funds are key steps toward restoring trust.